+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51
  1. #21
    Not so easy, remember Wikileaks boycott.

    However, i agree with that. Epoch billing support sucks, they doesn't like money, i wanted to switch from Safetypay to other payment method and i was stuck like three months because purchases with Safetypay was did with raw cash, not credit/debit card.

    And now i'm stuck again, perhaps i will need to use Paypal or debit to get Airu card in a few days.

    I hope they consider to ADD other payment processors. I know who is Epoch owner: Mindgeek, owner of Brazzers and DP and their content is present on Nutaku (see Hellfire Girls), so isn't easy for Nutaku to break those ties.
    Last edited by chillinfar; 01-01-2016 at 02:46 PM.
    Give one F2P game to a Korean: He will turn it in a P2W (pay to win)
    Give one F2P to an American: He will turn it in a P2F (Pay to fail)
    Nutaku ID: 454836


  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by chillinfar View Post
    I hope they consider to ADD other payment processors. I know who is Epoch owner: Mindgeek, owner of Brazzers and DP and their content is present on Nutaku (see Hellfire Girls), so isn't easy for Nutaku to break those ties.
    That would explain a lot. I'm sure it's only the surface of the sticky situation.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,742
    Credits
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Schverika View Post
    Every time I see the argument "go find another payment processor", I find myself thinking "then do it yourself". If you don't like a company, find another one. If you can't find a replacement, make one. Be a rival company and either outperform or corner a niche. That's how the market works. Terminating relations with a company is absolutely ordinary and nothing to get sentimental over.
    Who is this even directed to?

    It's not our obligation as customers to find better alternatives for Nutaku to get our money. It's their job to make it more appealing for us to spend.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    It's not our obligation as customers to find better alternatives for Nutaku to get our money. It's their job to make it more appealing for us to spend.
    No it's not obligation. Acting only out of obligation is not how you get the most out of the world. "It's somebody else's problem" doesn't automatically exclude you from solving it yourself (and reaping the benefits).

  5. #25

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,742
    Credits
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Schverika View Post
    No it's not obligation. Acting only out of obligation is not how you get the most out of the world. "It's somebody else's problem" doesn't automatically exclude you from solving it yourself (and reaping the benefits).
    That's not how a business works. The "do it yourself" argument makes no sense, or there'd be no point to things like customer service. If we're dissatisfied, we find alternatives or we complain. Since viable alternatives don't exist yet (don't say DMM), I and others will complain and be justified in our complaints until we at least get some decent compromises on their end.

    The consistent event schedule is a start, but that was something the Aigis devs were obligated to do (and not doing so likely made their profits suffer). The fact that we're still missing the basic Mischa/Nenya or us not getting Claire/Bella in this gold rush when we already have units like Phyllis is still cause for concern. As I said earlier, the Aigis devs made the decision that they don't want to do the extra work of taking the all-ages routes or giving us suitable replacements, so it's on Nutaku to work their way around that.

    At any rate, this is just shifting the blame. It's ultimately still Nutaku's responsibility, especially since they're the ones with all the information. Implying that we should be looking for a solution when they won't even bother to elaborate on things like what truly constitutes loli in the payment processor's eyes is a fool's errand.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    That's not how a business works.
    It's how the free market works. Entrepreneurship.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    If we're dissatisfied, we find alternatives or we complain.
    You've just stated my point, right after saying "your point doesn't make sense". You misunderstood my point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    Since viable alternatives don't exist yet
    We call this a "market opportunity".

    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    I and others will complain and be justified in our complaints

    It's ultimately still Nutaku's responsibility
    Of course you're justified. Of course it's their responsibility. Letting that be an excuse to not do more hinders progress.

    Your line of argument is based on rationalizing reasons why you shouldn't even think of becoming the viable alternative. What you should be doing is listing all the reasons why you personally can't make your own company and forge favourable relations with other companies to deliver the service that's in demand. There's plenty to put on that list.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,742
    Credits
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Schverika View Post
    Your line of argument is based on rationalizing reasons why you shouldn't even think of becoming the viable alternative. What you should be doing is listing all the reasons why you personally can't make your own company and forge favourable relations with other companies to deliver the service that's in demand. There's plenty to put on that list.
    Except no, your own logic is based on the faulty premise that "enjoying something but being dissatisfied with the service means you should be qualified to do it yourself."

    I shouldn't need to list the reasons on how 99% of Nutaku's customer base likely doesn't fall under the combination of "qualified, motivated, AND having the proper time and resources" to be a competitor. You act like anyone can just start a company on the spot.

    Yes, all our arguments and complaints likely get us nowhere, but that doesn't mean it's on the customers to take direct action as a competitor in order to improve things. That's such a giant leap in logic that isn't feasible for most of us, so the only reason I can see you bringing it up is to just shift the blame. Which brings us back to this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Schverika View Post
    It's how the free market works. Entrepreneurship.
    Just because market competition is a healthy thing, doesn't mean that the entire population goes out to start businesses whenever they feel one business has wronged them. So again, pinning the blame on Nutaku's customer base when Nutaku doesn't satisfy them and saying we should be the ones to come up with a better solution is stupid. You can call it "taking the easy way out", but realistically speaking, that's how it is.
    Last edited by Eab1990; 01-02-2016 at 01:13 PM.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    doesn't fall under the combination of "qualified, motivated, AND having the proper time and resources" to be a competitor. You act like anyone can just start a company on the spot.

    That's such a giant leap in logic that isn't feasible for most of us

    You can call it "taking the easy way out", but realistically speaking, that's how it is.
    Excellent, you've finally said it out loud: "We're not good enough".

    Now that it's acknowledged, the next question would be "well how do I become good enough? I'm powerless now, but must I stay that way for the rest of my life?" I bring this up because that's a more constructive line of thought. Granted, all you wanted was to vent your frustrations. Much as people complain, if they don't act afterwards it shows how little they actually care about the topic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    doesn't mean that the entire population goes out to start businesses whenever they feel one business has wronged them.
    The restriction is due to lack of capability. Not because of some rule saying "only those who are obligated should act".

  9. #29

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,742
    Credits
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Schverika View Post
    Excellent, you've finally said it out loud: "We're not good enough".

    Now that it's acknowledged, the next question would be "well how do I become good enough? I'm powerless now, but must I stay that way for the rest of my life?" I bring this up because that's a more constructive line of thought. Granted, all you wanted was to vent your frustrations. Much as people complain, if they don't act afterwards it shows how little they actually care about the topic.


    The restriction is due to lack of capability. Not because of some rule saying "only those who are obligated should act".
    What the hell? No, that's NOT the next question.

    When people are dissatisfied with a game, they suggest the makers do something to improve the game, or move onto something else. They don't necessarily make their own game.

    Dissatisfied with a restaurant? Complain to the owners for compensation, or have food somewhere else. Not start their own restaurant.

    And so on. Extend this line of thought to every product/service in existence. The answer isn't simply "make your own".

    The fault, again, lies not with us, therefore there ISN'T a need to improve ourselves. It's like you're asking every person to strive for perfection in all fields of life. Be some super-successful everyman. That's not reality. If everyone could make their own thing, there'd be no point to a business.
    Last edited by Eab1990; 01-02-2016 at 01:49 PM.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    The fault, again, lies not with us, therefore there ISN'T a need to improve ourselves.
    Again with this rationalization of sloth. You seem obsessed with blame, fault and obligation. Those are not relevant in the argument I'm putting together. Stop looking for what isn't there in my words.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
    It's like you're asking every person to strive for perfection in all fields of life. Be some super-successful everyman. That's not reality.
    An attempt to dilute the 'target scope' by pointing out everybody else. The correct answer is "I am striving in a different field of life, therefore I choose not to strive in this one".

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •