View Poll Results: 1

Voters
5. This poll is closed
  • 1

    4 80.00%
  • 1

    4 80.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 1673

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Unregistered Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zandel View Post
    Just so you all know it's working as intended... I've had 7, 7, 7 corns for the first 3 resets so far. Seems to be close to a 20% drop rate or one per 5 missions you do.
    A statement of subjective bias akin to standing in Siberia and declaring global warming a hoax because it's a bit nippy out.

  2. #2
    Unregistered Guest
    I have to disagree, one person getting 7-7-7 and others getting 1-1-1 IS "working as intended".

    It's just the intent is to shaft people that get unlucky, to (hopefully) get them to use some cores to make up for for their bad luck. If the developers were feeling particularly predatory, they'd slant the odds based on how much money you've previously spent.

    One of the reasons I have a personal rule to never pay for anything related to "RNG" in games. I don't know they aren't manipulating the RNG to try to get me to spend more once they know they've got a spender.

  3. #3
    Unregistered Guest
    If their goal was to incentivize spending, they'd get more people within one or two basket purchases of obtaining the goal, not make people say fuck it, I'm not spending 2,500 cores on ten RNG chances to only maybe catch up.

    This is not working as ANYONE intended.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    809
    Credits
    791
    Ok so I forget that Sarcasm does not translate well on the internet. I know i'm an outlier in this and have been VERY lucky since the more research i've done the more it seems the actual drop rate is indeed closer to 5-10%.

    I do wonder how I was able to get such a good drop rate tho, statistically if the actual drop rate is much less, then the chance of getting 7 three resets in a row is quite low.
    Flower Knight Girl: 255445855

  5. #5
    Unregistered Guest
    Low, but not zero (hooray statistics). The larger the sample size, though, the more it will tend towards average-- so if there were lots of people with 7-7-7- and a few with 1-1-1 then it would indeed seem to indicate a higher (20%) chance, but when it's skewed the other way that tends to suggest that the 7-7-7 is the outlier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •