Thread: Fake Lay

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Yes, nothing can be confirmed, but it can't be denied either. So if it makes the developer profit and it can't be confirmed, why would they not rig it? It's very easy in a software as opposed to a real blackjack game. And yes the dealer does make an enormous effort to lose when you bet low(hits even above 16), but that doesn't seem to be the case at higher bets. From the limited games I've played, when I bet 1, I win about 40-50% of the time, when I bet higher(especially near 100) that drops drastically. You can slow grind it I suppose, but most people don't enjoy gambling or don't like wasting huge amounts of time. I've no idea why they switched up from a skill-based games to luck-based ones... maybe some of them were pretty bad, but all you won were costumes so it was fine. Now you get diamonds and compete, which can make people more competitive, but that can be exploited too. While I'm not accusing them, I don't see why they wouldn't do it.

Because it does not make sense to simplify rules in player favor (let dealer continue after player busts) and then add some hidden mechanics that are rather complicated to implement. If they just wanted to win against players, they could have used normal rules and everything would be perfect - players with basic strategy lose 1% to casino on average according to wiki, players that deviate from that strategy lose even more. By changing rules they allowed players who follow the strategy to win on average, so why invest money in developing something extra to take it back?

From the limited games I've played, when I bet 1, I win about 40-50% of the time, when I bet higher(especially near 100) that drops drastically.

You experience observation bias. Try getting to 200 while playing with 1 chip bet and notice the lowest value that you get to. It will take you ages and sometimes you will drop to 70 or even less. Maybe you will even lose all 100 chips eventually depending on your strategy. Dropping to 70 means that you would have lost 3000 on 100 chip bets and because you don't play with 100*100=10000 initial chips each lose on that try is much more noticable than on 1 chip bets try, that's why it feels like it is much easier to win on small bets (because loses are less noticable).

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Because it does not make sense to simplify rules in player favor (let dealer continue after player busts) and then add some hidden mechanics that are rather complicated to implement. If they just wanted to win against players, they could have used normal rules and everything would be perfect - players with basic strategy lose 1% to casino on average according to wiki, players that deviate from that strategy lose even more. By changing rules they allowed players who follow the strategy to win on average, so why invest money in developing something extra to take it back?


You experience observation bias. Try getting to 200 while playing with 1 chip bet and notice the lowest value that you get to. It will take you ages and sometimes you will drop to 70 or even less. Maybe you will even lose all 100 chips eventually depending on your strategy. Dropping to 70 means that you would have lost 3000 on 100 chip bets and because you don't play with 100*100=10000 initial chips each lose on that try is much more noticable than on 1 chip bets try, that's why it feels like it is much easier to win on small bets (because loses are less noticable).

To be fair implementing a system like that would be easy, but not necessary, since it's pretty obvious where the problem is and it's not hidden at all. The 100 starting credits and the 100 max bet, are what make the game pretty unfair. You can't bet with a standard strategy because you hit your limit at a lose streak of 7, and should you try a more risky strategy with big bets, you can easily lose with an even smaller lose streak of 4-5 which happens pretty often. You may use an advanced strategy to increase your odds, but at that point you're crawling along so slow you're better off not playing and paying, because you're wasting time that can be spent earning money

P.S.I do hope it is legal. Even if money is only flowing in both poker and blackjack are gambling games, you're not winning money when you win, but you're still taking someone else's investment in the game by playing a game of odds. In blackjack's case your investment goes into thin air, while in poker it goes to another player. While the credits can't be converted into real money the concept is still the same- someone is profiting off luck. : /

So, has anyone actually managed to unlock 8 girls to unlock the sex scene? What's that like? Is it like the Halloween and School ones where the girls just appear in a background of an animated sex scene or something?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

So, has anyone actually managed to unlock 8 girls to unlock the sex scene? What's that like? Is it like the Halloween and School ones where the girls just appear in a background of an animated sex scene or something?

It is a scene with the dealer chick, Miss Heart and random dude.

So the scene has nothing to do with the girls unlocked?

What I don't really get is why all of these event outfits are completely covering up all the girls. This is supposed to be a sexy game, so why aren't there sexier event items for those who like some peeping nipple or flashing pussy. Not all the girls in all the events, but get a good mix in there to satisfy the players who like the mystery of covered naughty bits and the players who fantasize about girls in poorly-placed ribbons.

Originally Posted by 420gamer

It is a scene with the dealer chick, Miss Heart and random dude.

any chance you can throw us a link?

Yeah, don't know about anyone else, but I can't be bothered with the poker. 1 sex scene requiring lord knows how much winnings, I just don't have the time to put into virtual poker.

Hopefully the Valentines event from last year will be rerun, perhaps with the 5 girls added since then also getting into it too?

looks like the valentines thing is up for revival, but i won it with Maggie and did not get the suit.