um? you do realize liking porn pictures of underage 2d girls makes you a pedophile too, right? you can't justify that or make excuses on their behalf. they deserve no sympathy or respect. it's not a disorder, it's a disgusting habit and yeah i understand that it's probably not a crime in third-world countries such as the philipines or literally anywhere in asia/africa. making excuses like that is sympathizing with degenerate scumbags.
yeah also, i don't want this topic or conversation to go on any longer. i've made my point, and i'm sure plenty of others agree with where i'm coming from. no more plz. people that proudly claim to be "lolicons" are clearly not only interested in just 2d. i'm sure 90% of "lolicons" want to take their disgusting "fetishes" further. everyone is entitled to believe what they think is right, you don't consider lolicons real life pedophiles, while i do. because any kind of sexualization of children whether its real or not is absolutely disgusting to me. but yes, i know their is a huge difference between the two, and one is FAR worse than the other. i just don't respect either of them, though.
"lolicon describes a fascination with cartoons of very young-looking girls engaged in varying degrees of erotic behavior. "
end of discussion. i doubt people like this topic, i certainly don't. hence the reason i changed the subject. my facts are straight.