Results 1 to 10 of 401

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by sanahtlig View Post
    Have both groups spam the Expert event fight for the rest of the week
    That's where you lost me; I already said that I'm not going to experiment with my odds during this event. I doubt you'll find 10 players willing to do that. There's plenty of time to work out a methodology for the 3 days between events. This should get a separate thread, though.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,227
    Credits
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterE View Post
    That's where you lost me; I already said that I'm not going to experiment with my odds during this event. I doubt you'll find 10 players willing to do that. There's plenty of time to work out a methodology for the 3 days between events. This should get a separate thread, though.
    There's no "experimentation" involved. It's an observational study. The players with Snatch will use it. The players who don't... won't. But whatever. Do your own limited study with insufficient power and reduced significance (to the drops players are actually interested in) and then we'll be the ones to tell you your findings are 'anecdotal'...
    Last edited by sanahtlig; 02-24-2017 at 04:31 PM.

  3. #3
    I didn't tally mark my runs with n without anzu. I can say though, snatch makes the trash mobs drop silver more, usually they drop 2 silver each more cmmonly with 1-2 stack of snatch on them. As well as Apoc dropping gold chest more frequent with snatch up. Its not a big margin, but given the amount of time you are gonna run events for drops. If u plan to farm a lot, its highly recommended for atleast investing in gran as you can get 3 snatch attempt every 3 turns. Luck is a huge factor definitely, snatch just close that silly margin ever so slightly. N Jelly at all those double anzu users.

  4. #4
    seems like mordred has to wait getting my some snatch it seems

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by sanahtlig View Post
    There's no "experimentation" involved. It's an observational study.
    You know, the intellectual dishonesty you've shown so far convinces me your PhD gave you certainty of your opinions, but not the humility to reassess them. If you don't recalibrate the lenses you perceive through, your observations become flawed. You can't be trusted with an observational study.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    2,227
    Credits
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterE View Post
    You know, the intellectual dishonesty you've shown so far convinces me your PhD gave you certainty of your opinions, but not the humility to reassess them. If you don't recalibrate the lenses you perceive through, your observations become flawed. You can't be trusted with an observational study.
    Mhm. Yeah, have fun tangling with those windmills. I'll be over here.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,851
    Credits
    1,531
    Items User Name Style ChangeUsername Change
    First rainbow chest or whatever you call it and I get a friggin SR weapon.

  8. #8
    i see MasterE got tired of being wrong when arguing against game mechanics that easy to proof and documented, so now he arguing on topic that is difficult to prove or disprove.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •