I'm glad you liked the article.
I definitely feel that Nutaku's ties to the Western porn industry define its entire business. These ties are both Nutaku's strength and its weakness, allowing it to reach a greater audience than it would otherwise, yet giving them less freedom to navigate cultural issues like this.
It's still not clear where MindGeek's content restrictions end and payment processor restrictions begin, and how regional law influences both of these. Nutaku may be forced to use certain payment processors and/or banks that MindGeek uses or that do business in Canada, further limiting their freedom of action. I don't think Nutaku is being fully transparent about what options are open to them and what options are closed, much like a poker player keeping their cards close to their chest.
What I do have is this statement from Nutaku, which I was given permission to quote:
Quote:
While I appreciate your offer to conduct a formal interview regarding Nutaku’s [position] with [respect to] censorship, this is not exactly an area where it is advisable for us to bring undue amounts of attention to ourselves. Firstly due to the fact that by taking a strong public stance on this issue we invite greater oversight from the powers that be (you can read NutakuDev’s comment to that effect on Harem Battle Club). Secondly, we don’t particularly want Nutaku to be considered synonymous with censorship, regardless of whether we have a choice in it.