Thread: Kamihime Project R has had rape content censored in the Nutaku release

Originally Posted by sanahtlig

And there's no guarantee that if you DON'T watch/enjoy rape/bestiality/guro that you won't do the same in real life. Your argument is Trumpian: that is, implying negative consequences based on a gut feeling with no actual justification. If you'd like to present objective evidence or a logical argument to back your claims, however, feel free.

The whole thread is pointless, not helping to community you know that? I mean more than ninety percent wouldnt mind few words being changed cuz bgr suffering so much of it but people still playing it nevertheless and they only care about if devs gonna release next event or not. You're obviously missing the whole point of these games, people not living in it like you.

As for my argument, lets say im wrong, how do you think you'll prove yours? Your behaviours and this thread feels like you're using your jap knowledge as a boasting material. Dunno why i involved in the first place, maybe too much free time.

You don't seem to understand where I'm coming from. I didn't come here to fight censorship. Neither did I create this topic because I'm bored. It just so happens that I'm an anti-censorship advocate, and that the game I've been playing was stealthily censored, and therefore I'm obligated to spread the word about it. I've been doing this for a while, long before I'd ever heard of this game, or even before Nutaku existed. In addition, I've been going back and forth with Nutaku about this for a while now, and they failed to live up to their promises to me and others to disclose future alterations.

As for my argument, lets say im wrong, how do you think you'll prove yours?

What is my argument? Or what do you think it is? I'm curious.

Your behaviours and this thread feels like you're using your jap knowledge as a boasting material.

'I know you are but what am I?' Can't you argue without questioning people's motivations?

I'm more annoyed by the lack of spaces between a lot of the text and general badness of the translation than anything else.

Seriously though, the lack of spaces infuriates me.

Originally Posted by BigBobs

I'm more annoyed by the lack of spaces between a lot of the text and general badness of the translation than anything else.

Seriously though, the lack of spaces infuriates me.

The spacing issues are a problem, but the translation itself seems above average compared to what I've seen in other Nutaku titles (minus the edits, which are awful). The Japanese script itself isn't very good though. Storytelling is not this game's strength.

In addition, the game appears to be following the original event schedule and using the updated system / engine. There's a level of technical competence, effort, and polish in the English release which seems to be lacking in the other Nutaku titles I've played.

Originally Posted by BigBobs

I'm more annoyed by the lack of spaces between a lot of the text and general badness of the translation than anything else.

Seriously though, the lack of spaces infuriates me.

This appears to be a formatting issue rather than a typo issue. If you actually look in the text logs you find that it doesn't have this problem because the two words are separated by a line break. A little quality control would go a long way in their text department.

- - - Updated - - -

Regardless of my opinion on the specific content being censored, I believe it's healthy for consumers to regularly challenge companies on decisions they make (for both sides).

Forcing them to regularly consider the ramifications of their actions is healthy, and allows a more balanced consideration of their choices. Forcing them to take a clear stand and define their limits is much better for consumers, and by challenging them on harder to defend positions like these prevent them from superfluously skipping over or disregarding other content.

The biggest issue consumers have with companies is transparency, and Nutaku has consistently avoided taking a clear stance on censorship and frequently contradict themselves. Dragging these discussions/arguments to light is a good thing. Companies without clear values or ones that contradict their values tend to have the most morally suspect behavior, at no specific fault of the employees.

I don't believe that anyone, on either side of the argument, wants to have no input into Nutaku's choices and simply follow whatever they choose.

Regardless of my opinion on the specific content being censored, I believe it's healthy for consumers to regularly challenge companies on decisions they make (for both sides).

Forcing them to regularly consider the ramifications of their actions is healthy, and allows a more balanced consideration of their choices. Forcing them to take a clear stand and define their limits is much better for consumers, and by challenging them on harder to defend positions like these prevent them from superfluously skipping over or disregarding other content.

The biggest issue consumers have with companies is transparency, and Nutaku has consistently avoided taking a clear stance on censorship and frequently contradict themselves. Dragging these discussions/arguments to light is a good thing. Companies without clear values or ones that contradict their values tend to have the most morally suspect behavior, at no specific fault of the employees.

I don't believe that anyone, on either side of the argument, wants to have no input into Nutaku's choices and simply follow whatever they choose.

Whoops, was unregistered and that reply folded into another persons.