Thread: Kamihime Project R has had rape content censored in the Nutaku release

Originally Posted by BigBobs

I'm more annoyed by the lack of spaces between a lot of the text and general badness of the translation than anything else.

Seriously though, the lack of spaces infuriates me.

This appears to be a formatting issue rather than a typo issue. If you actually look in the text logs you find that it doesn't have this problem because the two words are separated by a line break. A little quality control would go a long way in their text department.

- - - Updated - - -

Regardless of my opinion on the specific content being censored, I believe it's healthy for consumers to regularly challenge companies on decisions they make (for both sides).

Forcing them to regularly consider the ramifications of their actions is healthy, and allows a more balanced consideration of their choices. Forcing them to take a clear stand and define their limits is much better for consumers, and by challenging them on harder to defend positions like these prevent them from superfluously skipping over or disregarding other content.

The biggest issue consumers have with companies is transparency, and Nutaku has consistently avoided taking a clear stance on censorship and frequently contradict themselves. Dragging these discussions/arguments to light is a good thing. Companies without clear values or ones that contradict their values tend to have the most morally suspect behavior, at no specific fault of the employees.

I don't believe that anyone, on either side of the argument, wants to have no input into Nutaku's choices and simply follow whatever they choose.

Regardless of my opinion on the specific content being censored, I believe it's healthy for consumers to regularly challenge companies on decisions they make (for both sides).

Forcing them to regularly consider the ramifications of their actions is healthy, and allows a more balanced consideration of their choices. Forcing them to take a clear stand and define their limits is much better for consumers, and by challenging them on harder to defend positions like these prevent them from superfluously skipping over or disregarding other content.

The biggest issue consumers have with companies is transparency, and Nutaku has consistently avoided taking a clear stance on censorship and frequently contradict themselves. Dragging these discussions/arguments to light is a good thing. Companies without clear values or ones that contradict their values tend to have the most morally suspect behavior, at no specific fault of the employees.

I don't believe that anyone, on either side of the argument, wants to have no input into Nutaku's choices and simply follow whatever they choose.

Whoops, was unregistered and that reply folded into another persons.