Regardless of my opinion on the specific content being censored, I believe it's healthy for consumers to regularly challenge companies on decisions they make (for both sides).

Forcing them to regularly consider the ramifications of their actions is healthy, and allows a more balanced consideration of their choices. Forcing them to take a clear stand and define their limits is much better for consumers, and by challenging them on harder to defend positions like these prevent them from superfluously skipping over or disregarding other content.

The biggest issue consumers have with companies is transparency, and Nutaku has consistently avoided taking a clear stance on censorship and frequently contradict themselves. Dragging these discussions/arguments to light is a good thing. Companies without clear values or ones that contradict their values tend to have the most morally suspect behavior, at no specific fault of the employees.

I don't believe that anyone, on either side of the argument, wants to have no input into Nutaku's choices and simply follow whatever they choose.

Whoops, was unregistered and that reply folded into another persons.