Thread: Kamihime Project R has had rape content censored in the Nutaku release

Originally Posted by HungryHunter

notice a lot of ass kissing w/ the anons which seem fishy as hell

Let's examine this, which seems to be an accusation that I'm posting anonymously to create an illusion of support for this. This is essentially saying, "There's *no way* that this many people could hold a view I disagree with. The support must be fabricated." Can't you see the folly of such a claim? What is this based on, other than faith that you're right, and everyone agrees you're right? Does this line up with the number of forum regulars who've spoken out against this thread vs. those who've showed support? I can't see such claims as anything other than mean-spirited spite intended to put down someone else. Adding "personally no offense" doesn't make a personal attack inoffensive. You're calling me out, implying that I'm doing something shady--with no basis whatsoever--and then trying to appear that you're being evenhanded. Sorry, you're not being evenhanded or inoffensive. You're just being a hypocrite.

and causing everyone gets toxic to each other instead of accepting people have different strokes when it comes to it

That's all you. Not me. I set out to conduct this thread without engaging in personal attacks, but that doesn't excuse you to say whatever you want. Stay on topic and avoid the personal attacks. Thanks.

As for where the so-called stream of anons is coming from, the thread was linked on 4chan (not by me ). They hate censorship and had their fun mocking some of the posters in this thread. I also linked the thread on my Twitter account before I posted the article on my blog. So there you go. There's nothing 'shady' going on here. It just so happens that more people care more than you thought. Where I come from, those who support censorship are the outliers, not those who oppose it.

I've got one more.

Satan second scene: Standard, "Stop" being replaced by "More" and possibly more.

The beginning of this thread had a really negative connotation, the issue is that removing something despite the negative outlook on that thing is wrong.

Here's an example, lets say x character is raped by a noble in the game. Later on in the story they despise nobles and are always rude and offensive to them. Given the edits that we received there is then a loss of depth for that character, because they now have no reason to hate nobles and it seemed like they previously loved them. Writing should not always be morally right, if everything was morally right then there would never be any villains that you feel disdain for. Furthermore there is no limit to how far you could potentially push this, if you try to remove everything that is morally wrong somewhere then you end up with nothing left.

- - - Updated - - -

Van Helsing can be added to the list.

Perun opening scene is heavily censored, she keeps contradicting herself.
Her last line when she actually gets fucked also seems to be censored.

This one doesnt related to the topic but she also starts with cum already on her body