Thread: Wind Catastrophe

People get mad with you and you two only because you aren't discussing, but advicing a really bad strategy most of the time when this happens, right?

You shouldn't be advicing people over content you don't comprehend and cannot clear over the advice of players that do and have.

If you can't understand this then you're a special snowflake bigot with an over inflated ego.

Originally Posted by Neverbloom

If you can't understand this then you're a special snowflake bigot with an over inflated ego.

Can we not have this?

Originally Posted by Neverbloom

You shouldn't be advicing people over content you don't comprehend and cannot clear over the advice of players that do and have.

And just have this, but phrased in a more neutral way?

Originally Posted by Neverbloom

People get mad with you and you two only because you aren't discussing, but advicing a really bad strategy most of the time when this happens, right?

Alright.

Tell me the correct strategy for Wind Disaster Ragnarok then, please!

Originally Posted by Cobblemaniac

Probably not my place to talk considering I've only been in this community for a month or 2, but seeing there's been a crap ton of insults thrown around the forum for the past 2 days tells me this probably is gonna continue. Please, can we just take discussion civilly and not throw the "you're a shitbag wtf do you know" argument as easily just because there is a disagreement in opinion?

Am I part of the problem? I really have tried to stay civil. I may not give answers that satisfy people, but there's no rule that anyone HAS to engage with anyone else on a given topic.

Originally Posted by sanahtlig

Am I part of the problem? I really have tried to stay civil. I may not give answers that satisfy people, but there's no rule that anyone HAS to engage with anyone else on a given topic.

I'm terribly sorry to those that I have named, but I was directing those messages to VeryVoodoo and NeverBloom. You have your opinions, we will try to respect that. However, please remember that while you're sticking to your opinions, which may be factually correct depending on situation, that staying civil throughout the argument is better for pushing the community forward, which I do believe is your rationale for posting in this forum. We're all here with the purpose of trying to help each other, let's not allow our personal feeling of annoyance infiltrate this community?

To answer your question Sana, I've noticed that while you've indeed tried to be civil with your phrasing, one could interpret your tone as dismissive, as I quote here

What seems to be getting ignored here is that I didn't start this discussion to prove a point, but rather to get answers to specific questions from Voodoo. Answers he has declined to give even after reminding him. I have things to do; I can't waste all my time arguing here.

@Voodoo: Answer my questions and maybe I'll answer some of your's. Otherwise, I feel like I'm just spinning my wheels with you.

from general discussion thread #3360. Now, I understand that with context, at that point you're probably running out of patience, but it appears to probably add fuel to the fire that has already been burning kinda hot at that point. You don't have to satisfy people, and I'm not asking you to, but rather I might caution you that if you're dealing with someone already dissatisfied with you by that point, you probably shouldn't engage further

y is there drama on every single thread

Alright, since there's at least 3 people that agree we have a problem, I'm going to spin this off into another topic.

Originally Posted by Cobblemaniac

I'm terribly sorry to those that I have named, but I was directing those messages to VeryVoodoo and NeverBloom.

Haha, I find it pretty funny you're grouping me with someone like the neverbloom guy. Think that makes it pretty interesting/clear of the side you support at any rate. My discourse has been as civil as I could care to make it, all while engaging a person that kept trying to deflect and in the end ran away from the topic at hand.

Not to mention, they're the ones that quoted me and engaged me in the first place, not the other way around like they then tried to make it seem. Once, I realized they weren't actually going to address any of the points I discussed, at that point forward I knew it would be a waste of time to continue.

Originally Posted by VeryVoodoo

Haha, I find it pretty funny you're grouping me with someone like the neverbloom guy. Think that makes it pretty interesting/clear of the side you support at any rate. My discourse has been as civil as I could care to make it, all while engaging a person that kept trying to deflect and in the end ran away from the topic at hand.

Not to mention, they're the ones that quoted me and engaged me in the first place, not the other way around like they then tried to make it seem. Once, I realized they weren't actually going to address any of the points I discussed, at that point forward I knew it would be a waste of time to continue.

I would prefer to not derail this thread, so please do feel free to pm me on why I decided to direct my message to you, I will try my hardest to explain.

Originally Posted by Cobblemaniac

I would prefer to not derail this thread, so please do feel free to pm me on why I decided to direct my message to you, I will try my hardest to explain.

This is a place for public discourse, so I see no point in hiding that discourse in pms. If you don't feel like it in this thread, feel free to make a separate thread and address me there if you wish.

Though to be honest, I just have no interest in pm'ing you. Or really care enough to know why you think I'm with that neverbloom guy, lol. I was simply making the observation that I found it funny is all.