You act like those are mutually exclusive. Tanks, lightning rods, whatever. Fucking Conrad or Dahlia can accomplish more than Gellius in the right conditions.
I've said before that Gellius wins in a battle of attrition. But to say he's the best tank in every situation is completely wrong. Again, if you can safely DPS the fuck out of something before it can kill anyone, then Gellius is not your answer.
Get a fucking clue already.
not any tank can do the same job , and he needs a lot less healing compared to bernice for example for general maps. And instead of placing another healer , u can simply place a dps. ALso he doesn't costs insanely more then other heavies either to warrant placing another slighty weaker tank over him.
PS: talking about karma , she can even replace nadia for that matter as a duelist when you don't want to worry about healing. See how that works ? DIfference being that karma and gelius fill different rolls , while nadia and karma fill the same place.
You just admited that he's the unit with the best staying power in the game , but aparently he's not the best tank ? Wut ? Then you speak of tanks , and you say that dpsers make better tanks ? wut again ? You're even contradicting yourself now. Why am i expecting an actual conversation ? And being a tank is not the same thing as being a dpser. Sure , sometimes dps duelists are better then denfesive duelists , but in that case , you don't fucking place a heavy. You place a tank when you need a tank , and gelius is the best tank (need i remind you what a tank is in games before we start arguing again?) duh
Last edited by lolix; 04-09-2016 at 04:31 PM.
Because *gasp* Gellius is not the only one doing all the blocking at any given time!
If you need healers elsewhere, or your archers are preoccupied with whatever's in the sky, or you're lacking in AOE or DPS or whatever else, then your argument that Gellius is the best tank in every situation that calls for it falls apart, because your entire argument has hinged on the mistaken notion that Gellius with outside support trumps all else.
No my entire argument hinged on people using their brains. He is the best tank when you actually need a tank. If you have flyers , do you need a tank ? No , you place ranged dps. If you have rush maps or swarms , do you place tanks ? You generally place anti swarmers or aoe dps , yes ?
If you actually do need a tank , gellius is the best.
Edit : yes unregistred , nadia fits exactly said situation : who would have guessed that you place a dps duelist when you need dps ? But even then , she won't be the duelist you place in 100% of cases. Meanwhile , if you nee dto place a heavy on a map , and you have gelius , u can easily place him instead of any other tank
Last edited by lolix; 04-09-2016 at 04:43 PM.
And absolutely none of those situations are mutually exclusive either.
Remember the G map with Minerva? A rush map of merfolk, goblin archers/necromancers, and demons, including the scythe bastards with ranged attacks. You needed DPS, a few tanks/lightning rod blockers, and probably some luck with assassination. But ranged slots were spread out and you had three exits to block, so you needed to concentrate your DPS and use tanks or duelists with high block, or have a shitton of AOE on hand. Or use rogues/ninjas and hope for the best, but that's obviously not ideal.
Everyone used spread-out heavies to deal with the clusterfuck, but there's a situation that Nadia would've done much better than Gellius would have.
So your argument basically is "he is the best tank all the time since he can tank golems"?
Because while he has the best staying power, saying he is the best tank for every situation is not going to help.
It's like saying archers are the best dps for every situation because they deal a lot of damage at a fast pace. Sure, you want archers for a lot of situations, but many times a mage can be great too.
In the same sense, Gellius is only really the best tank as long as he does at least one of the following:
-Removes the need for another healer
-Doesn't give you a problem because you lack damage
-Cannot be replaced because you need his extreme sturdiness
If he does neither, then saying he is the best tank for that situation is, and i hate this word, retarded. If anything else can accomplish the tanking duty and also deals more damage then they are obviously the -better tank for the situation-
I wonder if my comments mostly get ignored in face of continously answering the others, because i sure never feel like i get replied to.
i get the feeling that you people confuse terms : "tanking" is not the same as "blocking". Different nuances , and while a tank also blocks a blocker doesn't necesarily tank.