Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
He never specified, therefore by extension my answer is not inaccurate looking at end-game, under the assumption that nutaku gets everything dmm gets when we reach the point in time where we get the unit (which has thus far been our basis for everything, except for those obviously skipped content which we're still expecting to get somehow eventually as Lafate puts them under faith events)
As i pointed out earlier , we have 2 subforums. DMM version , and our version. Wouldn't 1 think first at the nutaku version if someone asked a question on this subforum ? Also we both know that nutaku skips a lot of content , so u can't be certain anyway. It's still speculation at this moment.


Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
unless someone asks for short-term, I see no reason to give short-term. and as I mentioned, he never gave hints that he was a newbie or a player who has played for a long time, so I just gave the end-game answer. If newbies want useful information for newbies, then I'll provide useful information for newbies. otherwise I'd give the standard end-game answer.
So...you speculated that he's not a newbie , then you decided to give a speculative answer for end game content that we still don't have ?
And you see no problem with that ? At least do specify what's best for our version as well , just in case nutaku decides not to give us new mages for the next year...


Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
if you spell everything out, posts tend to get lengthy and people dont like reading wall of text. I let people link the information together, and if they fail to understand, they can ask again. That's how I roll and that's just one way of doing things. spelling everything out is just another. It does not mean I'm wrong in my way of doing things, that is what I mean.
Most people that ask questions would actually want answers that make sense. That's why people actually ask questions in the first place. They don't know , or are uncertain , and want another opinion. I'm guessing they would also like an opinion that make sense as well. For example , if i ask what archer is better ? and tell u that i have both spica and victoria , i do expect to understand why spica is more useful from your answer. I'm not just going to level her up , just because u said she's better without giving an actual argument why

Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
If someone wants to know my train of thought, or why I recommend a unit over another, then they can ask again. not everybody wants to know something like that. In other words, I answer straight to the point.
So ...people would have to come back multiple times to have a conversation with you , on a internet forum , instead of giving said person a complete answer for the start ? Sry , but i'd rather read a wall of text in my first response , then having to log for an entire day to get a clear answer to my problem.

Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
for another example: http://harem-battle.club/millennium-...95-advice.html
tenhou answered straight to the point, while you added a whole chunk of extra stuff. that is up to you, just like how tenhou chose to answer straight to the point, and answer yoxal when he had further queries.
the reason yoxal had very little else to ask after that , was because i answered most of his questions already

Quote Originally Posted by soranokira View Post
Now you see why I say you're single-minded when you're complaining about me giving straight to the point answers instead of being 'clearer' as you say? It's just different ways of answering.
You don't see the hypocrisy at all , when talking about single-minded people ?