Quote Originally Posted by Eab1990 View Post
Not giving them credit for what should've been done 6-12 months ago =/= Being thankful (or not being thankful) that they're doing anything to begin wtih

Let me reiterate. There is NOTHING Nutaku has done for you to be thankful for. YET.

If "we plan to keep the game running" was your absolute minimum for showering them with praise, more power to you. But until we actually start seeing changes, who's in charge literally makes no difference. The game could be as uneventful as Kanpani, for all you know. Having plans to fix this or that doesn't mean anything if it takes months upon months to take effect, and the game ends up being 4+ years behind DMM.

Nero's first post pissed me off because it sounded like we should've been grateful that Nutaku spoke up at all and decided to take matters into their own hands to begin with. Yeah, after two months of nothing, two other games were going to be canned, and after a year that this happened the first time when things were supposed to improve afterwards.
OK so I misread your post. My apologies. It came across like a raging rant, which I suppose it kind of was, but this post makes it clearer you're just saying "it's too early to be praising them, let's wait and see if they follow up on their promises." which is something I can get behind. I personally love this game and I hope they do indeed follow through and get this game back on its feet and running to get more in line with what's on DMM (which I don't play for several reasons).

That said, it does still sound like you don't understand how complicated, difficult and drawn-out negotiations to take over the game can be. Should it have been done 6-12 months ago? Maybe, but it's possible they were already discussing at the time and DMM's stance was "we've got it covered, leave it be", idk, some clarification on how long the talks have been going on would help a lot on this matter.