Quote Originally Posted by JSmith12 View Post
Hmm, very well put together. The descriptions are simple and concise and adding the relevant classes is also a good touch.

A question though. I believe it was asked previously but what about certain units that could take on other roles? For example, an Armor Breaker you mentioned has Enchanters and Alchemists fitting that role, yet we have Odette who on SAW can lower the enemies' magick resistance by 50%. However, she would normally be in the AoE Rear group. Is there any way to handle this kind of discrepancy?
Well Odette appears in both categories. As well as buffer due to her non-AW skill. How I'm personally handling it is that if I choose a unit for a role I won't generally have the for another role. For example, take Clissa. I have her as one of my three ganking units. She also appears in Anti-Rush and Ramp. In Anti-Rush instead of having Clissa for that I choose a Rogue, Monk, and Ninja instead (.... stares at all the fox spirits... I'll have you one day!), and for Ramp I choose another Valkyrie to take the role. Allowing that Valykrie to become a Geirolul better fitting that role, and Clissa to become a Reginleif to better fulfill the ganking role.

I think there was only one case in which I had a single unit fill multiple positions and that was simply because I didn't see any value in the other options. I believe that was Koyomi as both an Armor Breaker and AoE Rear unit. Which I suppose the example Odette would do that same thing.

Quote Originally Posted by lolix View Post
armor breaker is probably the wrong definition. Defense breakers would be a better title (since both armor and magic resistance are a form of defense), but that;s just semantics.


That being said, this is very well done late. good job
It was originally named Defense Breaker, but that didn't make sense. Since the defensive stat in Aigis in named Defense and not Armor. So instead of it breaking Magical and Physical Defense, it is breaking Magical and Physical Armor. If that makes any sense.