Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
(also, 4 hours for 30 (7.5 per hour) is better than 6 hours for 50. (8.3 per hour). Point was not only is 6 hours for 50 less efficient as the prior poster said, but you can't even get the full benefit of the 6 hours.
That's exactly what I said, but I was making it clear that the overall better choice was 4+4+2 so you get the full benefit that you wouldn't get taking a 6 hour.