View Poll Results: 1

Voters
5. This poll is closed
  • 1

    4 80.00%
  • 1

    4 80.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 1673

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Unregistered Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Don't tie the star level of the schematic to the map level, make that random as well. I don't think it's fair that low-level expeditions don't have a chance to get 5* schematics.
    Strongly disagree. It's important that there be some incentive to building up your forces to take on stronger enemies.

    Quote Originally Posted by Myrdin View Post
    Random emblem - retarded.
    In every game that has crafting elements CRAFTING means you know what you are getting, and you complete tasks necessary to get.
    Agreed. If emblem crafting offers no control over the finished product then you're better off doing any tile given even a vanishingly minuscule chance to acquire high level tanks or emblems.
    When they originally mentioned crafting I was pictured something that would let you re-roll one of the secondary modifiers on an emblem, or make a duplicate of an emblem you already own.
    Devs need to put more consideration into game system design.

  2. #2
    Unregistered Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Strongly disagree. It's important that there be some incentive to building up your forces to take on stronger enemies.
    There's plenty of incentive to get XP in this game. Absolutely nobody is going to say to themselves, "Well, I WAS going to work on grinding XP, but since I'm able to craft 5* emblems I won't bother anymore."

    Since 5* emblems are available as loot on lower level Factoria tiles they should also be available to craft at lower levels.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Devs
    Hello everyone, we will be doing a short emergency patch today, March 2nd from 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST.

  4. #4
    TreadNaught Guest
    Well we got a five star artillery on research and it's once again the grossly inadequate GW Tiger.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    2,788
    Credits
    2,505
    Quote Originally Posted by TreadNaught View Post
    Well we got a five star artillery on research and it's once again the grossly inadequate GW Tiger.
    How is she inadequate ?

    Personally she is better than the last Arty chan we got. Aint no Seren, but its better then the previous thats for sure.

  6. #6
    Apparently ppl don't like her cause she's "not as good as zoya", and that makes her "bad".

  7. #7
    TreadNaught Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by WhatIconceal View Post
    Apparently ppl don't like her cause she's "not as good as zoya", and that makes her "bad".
    Yep. Except, y'know... replace the words you put into my mouth with actual points like how she's only has a blast radius of four, and has a weak as hell damage output for her deployment cost. The FV3805 beats her on both points.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •