Originally Posted by
MuljoStpho
Side note looking at their multipliers (15, 65, 215, 915, and 2665):
* 2nd value is x4.33 larger than 1st value
* 3rd value is x3.31 larger than 2nd value
* 4th value is x4.26 larger than 3rd value
* 5th value is x2.91 larger than 4th value
Why are the steps so uneven? It kind of seems like they should have picked values that would either climb at a flat rate (each one x3.5 larger than the previous one, for example) or that would climb at an increasing rate (x2.5, x3, x3.5, and x4, for example).