Closed Thread
Page 29 of 30 FirstFirst ... 1927282930 LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 300
  1. #281

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    East EU
    Posts
    565
    Credits
    390
    Part they did collect data and do a beta run before they run with 2.0 big update and we can see how shitty it was ;].

    Personally if I was a whale and I got an "welp its life, but we are gathering data to maybe repair or maybe fuck it up even more" response I would reacted the same way as kokusho did.

    As a side note, they probably need someone who knows math in their team. To do all the balancing.

    A 2nd side note, technically if we would assume that each girl has the same 1270 cash/h at 3 stars. Then the time one would need to collect cash to upgrade girl on what ever number of girls he has would be always the same. Cause 60th girl would require 60 times more cash, than 59th, but at the same time you have 60 times 1270c/h vs 59 - thus theoretically time to upgrade girl 60th should be the same as 59.

    Problem is that it doesn't take into account few things, like there is cash/h in PvP or battling trolls and that doesn't go up with each new girl. Troll cash/h maybe goes up with new world/trolls. There is also the aspect of actually buying the affection items. There is also problem of 5 stars, how much more expensive they are, and how much more cash we will get from them. And also that it takes more time to upgrade than average time between new girls we get.

    Girl 60th should take 93 hours to upgrade (or actually any girl). On just perfect collecting of cash from harem alone, thats total cost and doesn't take time to collect the affection items aka just how much they cost. But 5 stars will require over 10 times the affection points. And nearly 20 times the total cash. While cash/h on 5 stars wont be 10/20 times higher, maybe twice as high at best.

    So over-all cash/h isn't really that big of a problem. As long as we don't count in the rising costs of upgrading stats, but we all can safely say the stats atm are useless. The biggest problem is time gating on affection items. IIRC I calculated that average shop buy-out is worth 330 affection points, which is 660 a day, which could maybe go up to a whole 1K if one leveled up once a day. And this is more or less a static number. So if we use average the per day down to around 830 affection points a day. Then to get a 60th/80th girl to 3 stars would take 15.5/20.7 days.

    If we go to 5 stars thou - those 15.5 days on 60th girl, change to 192 days. Fucking 192 days. And this begs a questions, who the fuck worked on the update to let this slide. Especially that already or soon we will have over 100 girls possible to have in harem. 100th girl would take 321 days in this system.

    This also doesn't take into account how long it takes for a single girl to get even on upgrading her stars on just hers cash/h upgrade alone, but we could argue that you upgrade mostly for the timer between collecting being longer, and to get the upgrade scenes/avatars.
    Last edited by Eversor86; 09-12-2017 at 09:56 AM.


  2. #282
    Quote Originally Posted by Eversor86 View Post
    Personally if I was a whale and I got an "welp its life, but we are gathering data to maybe repair or maybe fuck it up even more" response I would reacted the same way as kokusho did.
    He took a single sentence in a lengthy reply completely out of context. There was a lot more to it than just that, but he chose to take only the part that would make the devs seem bad and ignores the rest of the reply and every other related message from the devs. It wasn't the best reply they could have given, but it wasn't anywhere near as bad as he tries to make it seem. I'm far from a fan of the devs in this case, but trying to make them look bad through deception is not cool either. And yes, taking a part of a quote out of context is deception, the same kind of deception some tabloids use to make it seem like they have a real story.
    Last edited by soviras; 09-12-2017 at 10:59 AM.

  3. #283
    Sniddy on laptop Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I could put up with the drag of the story because the girls were fairly easily upgraded. Now it costs tons to get a girl to 3*. I have to wait days of collecting and gift resets to max out a single girl.

    Admittedly it was too easy before. I was stockpiling gifts until I got a new girl. Now it has swung the complete other direction.
    This

    Quote Originally Posted by kokusho View Post
    It looks like the developers responded to the affection problem on discord. Let's see what they said. JessieChan says "Before it was really easy to have affection scenes, now you have to spend a lot more time... Well, life.."

    Well, before I played a game that didn't have a broken system and didn't punish you for playing it, and now it is impossible to level up all of the girls I collect. So now I'm not going to play your stupid game anymore....Well,life.
    And if this is the attitude shown, hold the door Kokusho, I'm right behind you

  4. #284
    Unregistered Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniddy on laptop View Post
    And if this is the attitude shown, hold the door Kokusho, I'm right behind you
    count me in, and i'll just leave something behind as well *cough*bot*cough*, hate the updates, wasted more than 1 year on this game for something meh...

  5. #285
    Quote Originally Posted by Sniddy on laptop View Post
    This



    And if this is the attitude shown, hold the door Kokusho, I'm right behind you
    And this is why Kokusho is doing something bad by taking things out of context. That is not the attitude shown, that's just Kokusho taking things out of context and twisting their meaning.

  6. #286

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    1,206
    Credits
    954
    Ok that whats the full context, in what context was that sentence not damming?

  7. #287
    Yeah, the real context would be interesting, but out of context or not, there is a problem here:

    If we go to 5 stars thou - those 15.5 days on 60th girl, change to 192 days.
    Give or take a month, that's pretty aweful. Was there something...anything that would hint to plans to improve this?

  8. #288
    Quote Originally Posted by sniddy View Post
    Ok that whats the full context, in what context was that sentence not damming?
    It was part of an explanation where they thanked the community for sticking around while things didn't go as intended and where they laid out a basic plan as to what they were going to to from then on and that it would be changed when they figure out how to do it without making it worse. The very next part in that message was: "All being said, we want our game to bring fun to you. So we are going to just find the balance here". If I placed all related messages from Jessie and Kaos here, it would become a bit too much of a wall of text, but the attitude throughout it all is "we screwed up, we are working on a fix".

  9. #289

    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    5
    Credits
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by soviras View Post
    You should try reading everything and not an out of context part of just one message. You only make a fool out of yourself like this... In the same message from Jessie, she acknowledged the issue, and said they were gathering data to help them create a better balance.
    Oh really? And how was that full sentence quote taken out of context may I ask? Was it because before that sentence, he/she said we know there is a possibility that the affection is too expensive? How does that take the last sentence I quoted out of context? Or how about another line before that where it is said they want to give their changes a bit of time before the next changes? Does that change the context of that last line? Nope, not really. Or how about the big thank you to the nicest community out there? Does that change the context of that last sentence? Nope, including that line wouldn't have done shit to change the context of that sentence.

    So what exactly am I doing to "make a fool of myself" by quoting the last sentence of that statement? Was there another hidden statement somewhere that changes the context of it? I quoted the last sentence of a statement right on the front page of the wiki where everyone can see, it's not some mystery message that only I saw, deciphered from a cereal box decoder or some shit.

    The new affection system is obviously busted, and they are going to gather data to decide. It's broken they don't need to decide shit, they need to be working on a fix if they want to keep their players. I'll tell you what made me the fool. Wasting my huge stockpile of affection items I was saving since the beginning of the game. I used a shit-load on getting Bunny and Juliette up to 5 stars. I thought, "ok they are going up to 5 stars so that's why they are so expensive, this is going to be a major problem in the future if all the girls get to 5 stars, but at least the girl drop-rate is better, that's a positive". Then I get disappointing pictures and shit cash for the amount of affection and cash I poured into them (I spent all that to see Juliette with a hand penis). Sure that sucks, too. But then.....then......it's almost just as expensive to get any other girl to 3 stars and my stockpile saved up from over a year is gone? That fucking pisses me off! That is not too expensive. That is fucking broken and unplayable.
    Last edited by kokusho; 09-13-2017 at 12:38 AM.

  10. #290
    Quote Originally Posted by kokusho View Post
    Oh really? And how was that full sentence quote taken out of context may I ask? Was it because before that sentence, he/she said we know there is a possibility that the affection is too expensive? How does that take the last sentence I quoted out of context? Or how about another line before that where it is said they want to give their changes a bit of time before the next changes? Does that change the context of that last line? Nope, not really. Or how about the big thank you to the nicest community out there? Does that change the context of that last sentence? Nope, including that line wouldn't have done shit to change the context of that sentence.

    So what exactly am I doing to "make a fool of myself" by quoting the last sentence of that statement? Was there another hidden statement somewhere that changes the context of it? I quoted the last sentence of a statement right on the front page of the wiki where everyone can see, it's not some mystery message that I deciphered between the lines from a cereal box decoder or some shit.

    The new affection system is obviously busted, and they are going to gather data to decide. It's broken they don't need to decide shit, they need to be working on a fix if they want to keep their players. I'll tell you what made me the fool. Wasting my huge stockpile of affection items I was saving since the beginning of the game. I used a shit-load on getting Bunny and Juliette up to 5 stars. I thought, "ok they are going up to 5 stars so that's why they are so expensive, at least the drop-rate is better". Then I get disappointing pictures and shit cash for the amount of affection and cash I poured into them (I spent all that to see Juliette with a hand penis). Sure that sucks, too. But then.....then......it's almost just as expensive to get any other girl to 3 stars and my stockpile is gone? That fucking pisses me off!
    It was not the last sentence of the statement, and you know that just as well. Even the wiki version continues past that point. Also, Jessie has not edited the wiki, that was all by the players. You know it comes from the discord, you know the wiki entry was not from Jessie directly (anyone with some eyes can see that), and you don't even bother to check if you have read everything? And yes, it does change the context, because it comes down to a difference between telling the players to go screw themselves with their complaints and saying "shit happens, but we are working on fixing it". That is what context means, and it makes a difference. You are making a fool out of yourself by spreading partial information on purpose and for trusting a wiki that is edited by players without checking the facts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •