Quote Originally Posted by Slashley View Post
Maths don't lie, mates. Don't like it? Prove it wrong.
Have you really lost it to the point where you can't distinguish between Maths and Fantasy?
What you've been talking is like 'I will assume 1=2 and therefore 1 + 3 =5'.

I love Maths but the difference is, the rest of us are being practical. We all do our maths and theorycraft, then we see if that theory is actually applicable without which it is pointless as Blubbergott already stated.

In my case, if I think something is good but less used, I try to ask people who have used it more and actually know more about it than me. That's called curiosity which is how you become more knowledgeable.

You on the other hand get hyped by your discovery and assume everyone else is wrong because in your fantasy world, it is actually godlike. That is ignorance. They're at opposite ends of the spectrum.

Mind you it isn't just nutaku players criticizing you but DMM players too. I have the fortune of asking multiple DMM players about this topic and they all had the same thing to say.
Bear already said that Light Nike is good but her use is niche. And she is actually no where close to what your fantasy maths suggest i.e beating 100% Eidos. She isn't also better than many of the current Light meta himes because it's not just damage or assault buff they bring. Each has it's own distinct use which isn't easily replaceable just because some other hime looks so good on paper. Bear is a Light main who has done well in rankings too and made a Light guide here which also covered Light Nike but even he isn't mathematically inclined according to you right?

Another DMM light main had this to say "She is a permanent bench warmer". Mind you these are people who don't have access to prior information like us and by default the only way they have concrete information is by doing number crunching. So everyone of them has already done their maths way before you could think of it.

You are talking about people who love experimenting with their teams and himes and doing stuff like R runs on AQ4, SR runs on GO or maybe even R runs with a few elements. They test it in theory and then test it in practice unlike you who only does it in fantasy (For a theory to be practical, the base assumptions have to be practical first which aren't and hence, fantasy).

Which is why your statement of "people not being mathematically inclined" is foolish to the extreme. You can continue living in your bubble but that will harm you (and anyone who falls for that advice) when all the future content DMM players base their teams on rolls out, if you continue being arrogant and ignorant rather than curious.

I never had a personal problem with you but now I sort of. You always love making assumptions and baseless ones at that.
Either DMM players are space whales or BaarU isn't good because too much micromanagement or Light Nike > 100% eidos and most recently, people not being mathematically not inclined except you and Sanahtlig. Because I observed if he corrects you or when you are making an argument, it is always "According to Sanahtlig's guide........" but when someone more knowledgeable from DMM comes around and corrects you, they are a space whale or not mathematically inclined when they have it tested both mathematically and practically.

Please stop with making assumptions about people just because it doesn't fit your mentality. No one will every give you advice or bother debating with you if that's what you do because it becomes plain annoying.