Thread: Spading Snatch

4 runs gave me 0 gold chests consequently while snatched boss for 8-9 times and used anzu, once.
While:



To sum up, dmm veterans were right, snatch and anzu aint worth, go for d'art if you want her OPOP debuff, only! Otherwise she's as worse as Solomon. Actually, you still can use anzu to bait people who still believes anzu increase drop rates and use your anzu, thus get you more gems.

Originally Posted by Ramazan

To sum up, dmm veterans were right, snatch and anzu aint worth, go for d'art if you want her OPOP debuff, only! Otherwise she's as worse as Solomon. Actually, you still can use anzu to bait people who still believes anzu increase drop rates and use your anzu, thus get you more gems.

Behold! Double Anzu +7 stack snatch~!
imgur.com/JkDgdt2

Snatch increases drop rate not rarity so whether you get gold chests or not via Snatch is irrelevant. It's still RANDOM. Someone could get way more with or without Snatch compared to another in a single instance or through the entirety of play because it's RANDOM.

Can never understand why some people try to get some analysis of RNG. In this game for example, without knowing any of the actual rates from Snatch as well as from each stage, you can't make any sort of analysis that isn't purely observational.


The point in people trying to increase drop rates is to increase their odds of acquire something they want but I forgot the dumbass min-maxers are everywhere these days.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Behold! Double Anzu +7 stack snatch~!
imgur.com/JkDgdt2

tbh, i expected something like a dia+2 gold chests XD

Originally Posted by passerby

Snatch increases drop rate not rarity so whether you get gold chests or not via Snatch is irrelevant. It's still RANDOM. Someone could get way more with or without Snatch compared to another in a single instance or through the entirety of play because it's RANDOM.

Can never understand why some people try to get some analysis of RNG. In this game for example, without knowing any of the actual rates from Snatch as well as from each stage, you can't make any sort of analysis that isn't purely observational.


The point in people trying to increase drop rates is to increase their odds of acquire something they want but I forgot the dumbass min-maxers are everywhere these days.

Sorry, the whole post of yours made no sense to me. Idc about an unregistered's opinions anyway.

Originally Posted by Ramazan

tbh, i expected something like a dia+2 gold chests XD

Yeah haven't seen a single dia chest. I'll keep trying for double Anzu's anyway though just because. :P

Testimonials aren't objective tests, and 'observational study' is rife with cherry picking; both are prone to confirmation bias. I'm going to have to start a new thread to clearly define the objectives and methodology and hopefully cut the spam. You are all sure of your opinions, but they aren't informative even to you.

Originally Posted by MasterE

Testimonials aren't objective tests, and 'observational study' is rife with cherry picking; both are prone to confirmation bias. I'm going to have to start a new thread to clearly define the objectives and methodology and hopefully cut the spam. You are all sure of your opinions, but they aren't informative even to you.

Your arrogance, towards me and the community in general, is irritating. While you occasionally make valid points, your attitude makes it difficult to engage with you in anything but a confrontational manner.

Allow me to clarify your point here. The problem isn't with 'observational studies', which you seem to have so little regard for. You HAVE identified an important bias, which is termed reporting bias--in this case, the tendency to report only extreme results (e.g., a streak of no drops or a streak of valuable drops). Correcting for this requires selecting the subjects to be studied in advance, before the outcome (the drops they get) is known. You are correct that failing to correct for this will tend to result in biased anecdotal data that isn't useful. BUT if this is corrected for in advance, crowdsourced data can be a useful asset, and you would do well not to dismiss it.

Originally Posted by MasterE

Testimonials aren't objective tests, and 'observational study' is rife with cherry picking; both are prone to confirmation bias. I'm going to have to start a new thread to clearly define the objectives and methodology and hopefully cut the spam. You are all sure of your opinions, but they aren't informative even to you.

My main had d'art+too many anzu friends (deteled ALL of them an hour ago)
My alt have sieg, never used snatch before+0 anzu friends
I played since start to "observe" enough and i dont give a damn about your methodology and&or objective things, since my claims were "ALREADY" verified by dmm veterans, who played for more than 9 months, even if im wrong. Anyway it'd be great to see how you explain this despite all that, methodology professor.

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by Unregistered

i just got apocalypse from a platinum box in 30 ap quest with 7 stack of snatch maybe it was luck but i want belive that was for the snacth

Yeah, thats the whole point of the matter. And that also reminded me of:

Originally Posted by MasterE

I'm going to have to start a new thread to clearly define the objectives and methodology and hopefully cut the spam.

Can you just skip the comment phase and do the action? We all already debated over this matter at discord before.