... you do realize that only those who are very lucky happen to have a "decent fire team" at this point, right? I mean, with just one Miracle Ticket out, you can't really expect people to have more than 1-2 core Fire SSRs.
As such, does gacha luck equal skill? I wouldn't really call that an argument.... and what do you know? You're just guessing this because I said in another thread that I understand where Sanahtlig was coming from?
Not that it matters, but you know, my Grids are:
Thunder: 196/200 (140%)
Water: 216/220 (150%)
Wind: 180/220 (135% and leaving it there since I just wanted faster Thunder R4 Accessory quests)
Fire: 116/200 (100% and will be maxed next in preparation for Lust)
Dark: 112/240 (101%)
Light: lolno/lolno
And for the record, the lacking 4 slvls in both Thunder and Water are Defender SSRs which haven't had FLB yet on DMM. Before I commit resources on those, I want to know what will the secondary skill be. Defender weapons are kinda getting phased out by dual-skills, after all. Though that's a long, long, long time from now.
Anyway.
Is that what a mono-user looks like...? Yes? Oh. Okay then. My bad. I guess we just have a different definition of what a mono-user is.Because, it is actually possible to land those debuffs. As such, what? Are you going to take Amaterasu off your team because her chance to land Blind/Def Down/Atk Down is lowered? I doubt it. You'll still want to bring debuffs, you'll still want to try using debuffs. And if you actually get a debuff to land - for the next 180s, you'll have a massive advantage.
Thus, what is your actual counterargument? It's easy to fire shots, but if that's all you do, then you're not contributing to the discussion at all.I'm the one who runs that, you know? And I'm sure it's full of misinformation. I mean, I DID do it with Google translate rather than bothering with a zillion moonrunes by myself...
Does that make it worthless? I don't think so. Misinformation is not really a bitch, but it should be corrected. And that requires actual discussion.While true, it is also true that there's been some members lately who are more interested in flinging insults without actually offering any kinds of arguments of alternative methods. This isn't grade school, and it doesn't need to be.
Or by being passive aggressive, without contributing actual arguments to the discussion. That's high school level. It might be a step up, but really, we don't need that either. I'd like to think that we can do better.