Thread: How are your har... erm.. Armies coming along?

As i pointed out earlier , we have 2 subforums. DMM version , and our version. Wouldn't 1 think first at the nutaku version if someone asked a question on this subforum ? Also we both know that nutaku skips a lot of content , so u can't be certain anyway. It's still speculation at this moment.

you can think of nutaku version first, that is not an issue. I can think about end-game aigis, that's my prerogative and nothing you should be complaining about since it IS an answer. Whether it's the answer somebody is looking for is not something you or I will know until said person makes it clearer.

So...you speculated that he's not a newbie , then you decided to give a speculative answer for end game content that we still don't have ?
And you see no problem with that ? At least do specify what's best for our version as well , just in case nutaku decides not to give us new mages for the next year...

Rather than speculate, if something is ambiguous, I will simply answer what I think is the best answer to his question. as I have said, it is just one way of answering, there's nothing wrong with it.

Most people that ask questions would actually want answers that make sense. That's why people actually ask questions in the first place. They don't know , or are uncertain , and want another opinion. I'm guessing they would also like an opinion that make sense as well. For example , if i ask what archer is better ? and tell u that i have both spica and victoria , i do expect to understand why spica is more useful from your answer. I'm not just going to level her up , just because u said she's better without giving an actual argument why

'Making sense' of an answer is subjective. It also happens to require interpretation.
Regarding spica vs victoria as your example, some people already have an idea and just want a confirmation. not everybody wants a wall of text saying spica > victoria because she has higher dps, has a long lasting skill but victoria's increase attack is much better against high armor units and victoria has better burst so under certain situation victoria is better but general purpose-wise spica is better as an archer.

So ...people would have to come back multiple times to have a conversation with you , on a internet forum , instead of giving said person a complete answer for the start ? Sry , but i'd rather read a wall of text in my first response , then having to log for an entire day to get a clear answer to my problem.

thank you. you finally realized it's a matter of 'rather'. at this point, you're assuming that everybody wants a comprehensive answer to their question and they don't mind reading wall of text. but unfortunately, truth of the matter is that there ARE people who are not very interested in lengthy answers.

the reason yoxal had very little else to ask after that , was because i answered most of his questions already

once again, you're assuming that your method of answering is the one and only method that should be applied. maybe he actually liked tenhou's answers that were to the point instead of having to read your wall of text?

You don't see the hypocrisy at all , when talking about single-minded people ?

I don't see it here, because I'm not saying your way of answering is wrong. you are the one who says my manner of replying to questions is bad. all I am saying is reply to that, is that neither of our manner of replying to answers are wrong. your obsession with a comprehensive answer is the point I'm arguing about. There's a reason there's a 'summary' section in english examinations in comprehension.

just to add on to my point about reading comprehension and summary: http://englishachiever.com/21-tips-g...nsion-passage/

If you belong to this category, you need to understand that you don’t need to understand each and every word of the comprehension. At the same time, you should find the gist (summary) of it. Both these points above may appear contradictory But the crucial thing is, you need to eliminate the words, phrases, sentences from the Reading Comprehension that are not useful and need to focus on keywords.

Just because I avoid adding in additional details and only answer to the point does not mean I am wrong and I should change my manner of answering questions.


__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________


edit: in response to your line in the shoutbox:

Considering my worst issue with what u say is that you tend to look too much at what dmm has and ignore our version...or that you care too much for end game content disregarding priorities , that's not that big of a deal , and in the end it's not even wrong , assuming you put everything u have to say in the correct context.

you just said that me answering with what dmm has is not an issue.

I didn't said that giving dmm info is wrong.

as for the ignoring our version part, I will only respond IF the answerer wants it to be restricted to nutaku-only. Otherwise, just because I dont mention it to avoid clutter (from having to answer from 2 POV) doesnt mean I'm wrong. you having an issue with it is simply you being retarded.

and here's something from karsuman: http://harem-battle.club/millennium-...html#post24774

#2 - there's no rule that requires us to talk about only Nutaku units, so we will likely continue talking about DMM. the list I posted earlier also includes a number of units that have already appeared on Nutaku.

Nutaku players should probably be interested in the opinions of DMM players on units because it gives a strong indication of what is best to invest in. Presently the most effecting thing on a unit's worth is their awakening skill, which haven't appeared on Nutaku yet.