Quote Originally Posted by Slashley View Post
... yes. Because your (or some other Unregistered's) original argument that a 2400 Atk on-element turns into 2600 Atk. So I used 2400 base, which there are none of.Because I actually did the math for Anubis lately. I've made a damage calc for this,[/URL] you know.

The result was, swapping in Dark Eidolons resulted in a loss of damage. I got NEARLY back to where I was if I was running double Anubis though, but that's impossible for me. Or did it just barely go above? Eh, it was +-500 in 40k Atk at double Anubis.

However, note that I was comparing really bad Dark Eidolons, as... well, there just aren't any good ones (I wasn't playing during Trivia). To my +99 Tiamats, Miis and Sphinx. As such, the situation for Wind can be different. But, I wouldn't expect much honestly. Reminder that 4% more Elemental atk is NOT 4% more damage done.

Indeed but having extra 4% for base attack 50k is stronger than another 300 base attack.

It isn't possible to get lower see even ikarus without +99 is higher than tiamat and tiamat is best eidos so its impossible for ikarus to lose even in stats.
The only reason it can be worse its because you swap +99 and add not dark 99 eidos and very bad too. Try to compare +99 with +99 dark. Assuming you make a dark eidos grid and see which one better. +99 also should become +109 if its same eidos i think so its bigger boost if the eidos have stats increase.

Can you elaborate what you compare we will count it because without knowing what you swap its impossible to compare and find the mistakes.