Originally Posted by Myers

Never heard of a game with that on Nutaku.

Me either, but I don't venture out much.
I know crush crush implied it, but they are a really cool dev team and were poking fun at furries.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

Me either, but I don't venture out much.
I know crush crush implied it, but they are a really cool dev team and were poking fun at furries.

Ah I see. Though about Nutaku not wanting lolis: I don't think it's just their personal preference and there are some good reasons for them not wanting them. I've read posts before stating that they were having trouble with PayPal and payment processors in general because of the loli content in their games. Makes sense since PayPal is an American company and it's illegal there (but probably low priority). Then again it's also illegal in Canada, where Nutaku is based. I can imagine that could cause some sponsorship and advertising problems as well.

Originally Posted by Myers

Ah I see. Though about Nutaku not wanting lolis: I don't think it's just their personal preference and there are some good reasons for them not wanting them. I've read posts before stating that they were having trouble with PayPal and payment processors in general because of the loli content in their games. Makes sense since PayPal is an American company and it's illegal there (but probably low priority). Then again it's also illegal in Canada, where Nutaku is based. I can imagine that could cause some sponsorship and advertising problems as well.

Not that I want to defend actual real-life lolicons, but it actually is not illegal in the US. There has been several supreme court cases on these subjects actually, and it was deemed "disturbing, but not illegal". Paypal is just virtue signaling like every company nowadays. Also, people in general like to call it illegal because they do not know where the line is drawn. There is a line. Everything highly detailed and "hard to distinguish from photography" is illegal. Purslane and other chars on fkg are not photo like.... and if people thing they are photo-like... they need to get their eyes checked...

tl;dr: My Sensitive plant is not illegal and I will fight the one who says she is.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

Not that I want to defend actual real-life lolicons, but it actually is not illegal in the US. There has been several supreme court cases on these subjects actually, and it was deemed "disturbing, but not illegal". Paypal is just virtue signaling like every company nowadays. Also, people in general like to call it illegal because they do not know where the line is drawn. There is a line. Everything highly detailed and "hard to distinguish from photography" is illegal. Purslane and other chars on fkg are not photo like.... and if people thing they are photo-like... they need to get their eyes checked...

tl;dr: My Sensitive plant is not illegal and I will fight the one who says she is.

You don't have to worry about your Sensitive Plant, I've never heard anyone claim her to be a loli.

didn't nutaku have troubles with lolis cause they are leaf company?

Originally Posted by Myers

You don't have to worry about your Sensitive Plant, I've never heard anyone claim her to be a loli.

By the definition that is written in the law, it could be.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

didn't nutaku have troubles with lolis cause they are leaf company?

Maybe, although Canada is a lot more lax about those types of things. Although idk what is going on there is terms of politics atm.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

By the definition that is written in the law, it could be.



Maybe, although Canada is a lot more lax about those types of things. Although idk what is going on there is terms of politics atm.

think i've read somewhere leafs are more retarded than US on loli stuff.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

think i've read somewhere leafs are more retarded than US on loli stuff.

It's probably not that bad considering that Nutaku, a Canadian company, has had loli stuff for a long time and they're still alive.