Why would you compare her to a 6* when she is at lvl 80 200% and don't add the extra 100% affection to any 6*. That reason alone is why you should not compare her to 6*
The reason I say this is because the blossom affection has been around longer.

Also to add this why not focus on HP on the Whale Airship. A lot can happen since you don't have control and if you do mostly basic attacks you will probably die at higher levels

Originally Posted by Zer0

Why would you compare her to a 6* when she is at lvl 80 200% and don't add the extra 100% affection to any 6*. That reason alone is why you should not compare her to 6*
The reason I say this is because the blossom affection has been around longer.

Also to add this why not focus on HP on the Whale Airship. A lot can happen since you don't have control and if you do mostly basic attacks you will probably die at higher levels

That WAS with 100% affection for the 6*s and max level 70 as well. As I said originally, at lvl 80 with 100% second affection she is about 6* stats. Of course 6*s become better then 6* with 2nd affection / blooming so you know.

Originally Posted by Taon

Could you be more specific? Which girls stats are wrong? I just did a spot check on Peach and 4 random 6* that I have (Dendrobium, Alpinia, Lycoris and Anemone) and all of the listed stats were correct.

edit: Oh, I do see where Burning Bush's 100% and 200% stats got swapped, putting her below most 4* since they're ordered by 2nd affection TP.

I think it was nerine and burning bush with wrong stats. only looked at total power

Originally Posted by Zandel

That WAS with 100% affection for the 6*s and max level 70 as well. As I said originally, at lvl 80 with 100% second affection she is about 6* stats. Of course 6*s become better then 6* with 2nd affection / blooming so you know.

I know you were comparing them without the blossom affection, but its pointless to leave out this stat boost.Reason is: I don't think anyone is going to leave the units they like only at base affection stats