Originally Posted by FriendlyFacez

I think it'd be fun at one point or another to do a character ranking thread and let folks vote, akin to what the DMM forums are doing for 6*s in DMM now.

Only if we did so I'd want there to be two separate votes for each character: One based on personality / art / voice / design (the 'character', as it were) and another based on battle utility / use on teams.

I'd enjoy that thread, anyway.

Maybe I should start one sometime if others would enjoy it too and vote respectfully instead of resorting to juvenile flaming arguments.

Sure we could give it a whirl. I looked at some of those reviews and thing I see happening is blooming immediately changing ratings. Example Dogwood is a "D" today, but will become "S" when bloomed.

Originally Posted by phob

Sure we could give it a whirl. I looked at some of those reviews and thing I see happening is blooming immediately changing ratings. Example Dogwood is a "D" today, but will become "S" when bloomed.

I’d just start with all characters that have been Bloomed already, and we’d just compare bloomed forms with each other.

Once we caught up, we’d just continue reviewing bloomed forms as they released.

Originally Posted by FriendlyFacez

I’d just start with all characters that have been Bloomed already, and we’d just compare bloomed forms with each other.

Once we caught up, we’d just continue reviewing bloomed forms as they released.

Ok sounds good

Today's Daily Deal is Dusty Miller and 10 FG for 3000 NG.

Originally Posted by MachThreeSlug

Today's Daily Deal is Dusty Miller and 10 FG for 3000 NG.

Adding gems to drive up the price is such a shitty thing to di. They know this, and yet they keep doing it because they know some whales will jump at it still. I mean I guess 28USDs is not bad, but still :|

To me, and maybe this is just me, the inclusion of gems to raise the price 5 USDs is an insult. Its prying on people who thinking that gems are worth a dollar each, when in reality I would say they a worth $0.22.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

Adding gems to drive up the price is such a shitty thing to di. They know this, and yet they keep doing it because they know some whales will jump at it still. I mean I guess 28USDs is not bad, but still :|

To me, and maybe this is just me, the inclusion of gems to raise the price 5 USDs is an insult. Its prying on people who thinking that gems are worth a dollar each, when in reality I would say they a worth $0.22.

No its not a bad deal if you want Dusty Miller. What is this? the 100th time she's been offered? Jeez pick somebody new and Blooms are better.

Edit
I refuse to get her, nothing against the girl, she is just overdone and they are too dense to do a proper rotation. Up next Flowering peach?

You're upset about the 10 FGs thing, and I get that, but I want to take a moment to instead complain about Dusty Miller getting offered as the Saturday daily 6* deal YET AGAIN

It's seriously been like, fifty gadzillion times Dusty Miller for every one time it's someone else

Dusty Miller was up on offer a few months ago while other rainbows havent had a single chance. 3000 gold is already over half priced as rainbows typically go for 5000-6000.

Dont get angry because I said that that certain price is the actual price for rainbows though. You know who you are.