Originally Posted by HungryHunter

Not sure where dis was sy

Nutaku is shifting from Jap games to western porn games

A) no translation costs
B) no decensoring costs
3) no super mental kinks like loli, bestiality
4 some reason, Americans ain't mind furries lol

Oh yeah that 3rd point is totally legit. I think back in the day they had to censor loli scenes which pissed people off and eventually they stopped censoring them. With Western games, they don't have to deal with lolis. I've looked through the girls in the Western games before to see what they look like and I haven't seen a single one (not to the extent that they look like an actual child).

Also, what does that 4th point mean?

Originally Posted by Myers

Oh yeah that 3rd point is totally legit. I think back in the day they had to censor loli scenes which pissed people off and eventually they stopped censoring them. With Western games, they don't have to deal with lolis. I've looked through the girls in the Western games before to see what they look like and I haven't seen a single one (not to the extent that they look like an actual child).

Also, what does that 4th point mean?

I really do not understand the west's belief that lolis is the same as kitty porn. It is the most down right ignorant thing I can think off. I love collecting cute characters and frankly have no care about the lewd side of it. I much prefer cute lolis over the worn-down whore look of these "west" games.

And what he means Myers, is they bash lolis, but are okay with characters fucking legit animals.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

I really do not understand the west's belief that lolis is the same as kitty porn. It is the most down right ignorant thing I can think off. I love collecting cute characters and frankly have no care about the lewd side of it. I much prefer cute lolis over the worn-down whore look of these "west" games.

And what he means Myers, is they bash lolis, but are okay with characters fucking legit animals.

Never heard of a game with that on Nutaku.

Originally Posted by Myers

Never heard of a game with that on Nutaku.

Me either, but I don't venture out much.
I know crush crush implied it, but they are a really cool dev team and were poking fun at furries.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

Me either, but I don't venture out much.
I know crush crush implied it, but they are a really cool dev team and were poking fun at furries.

Ah I see. Though about Nutaku not wanting lolis: I don't think it's just their personal preference and there are some good reasons for them not wanting them. I've read posts before stating that they were having trouble with PayPal and payment processors in general because of the loli content in their games. Makes sense since PayPal is an American company and it's illegal there (but probably low priority). Then again it's also illegal in Canada, where Nutaku is based. I can imagine that could cause some sponsorship and advertising problems as well.

Originally Posted by Myers

Ah I see. Though about Nutaku not wanting lolis: I don't think it's just their personal preference and there are some good reasons for them not wanting them. I've read posts before stating that they were having trouble with PayPal and payment processors in general because of the loli content in their games. Makes sense since PayPal is an American company and it's illegal there (but probably low priority). Then again it's also illegal in Canada, where Nutaku is based. I can imagine that could cause some sponsorship and advertising problems as well.

Not that I want to defend actual real-life lolicons, but it actually is not illegal in the US. There has been several supreme court cases on these subjects actually, and it was deemed "disturbing, but not illegal". Paypal is just virtue signaling like every company nowadays. Also, people in general like to call it illegal because they do not know where the line is drawn. There is a line. Everything highly detailed and "hard to distinguish from photography" is illegal. Purslane and other chars on fkg are not photo like.... and if people thing they are photo-like... they need to get their eyes checked...

tl;dr: My Sensitive plant is not illegal and I will fight the one who says she is.

Originally Posted by Ampchan

Not that I want to defend actual real-life lolicons, but it actually is not illegal in the US. There has been several supreme court cases on these subjects actually, and it was deemed "disturbing, but not illegal". Paypal is just virtue signaling like every company nowadays. Also, people in general like to call it illegal because they do not know where the line is drawn. There is a line. Everything highly detailed and "hard to distinguish from photography" is illegal. Purslane and other chars on fkg are not photo like.... and if people thing they are photo-like... they need to get their eyes checked...

tl;dr: My Sensitive plant is not illegal and I will fight the one who says she is.

You don't have to worry about your Sensitive Plant, I've never heard anyone claim her to be a loli.