Originally Posted by Ladies lover

1&3)well ... when i deleted EAss my pinks took about 30 secs ~ 2 minutes to be opened although I have a lot more friends specially active advanced ones than 4th gambit cuase I leveled up . now according to what you think there should not be that delay so that it is clear you are wrong . this makes it clear that it is because of his cheating and he just changed cheating style this gambit .

2&4) LOL so you know I talk about pink only and have some EXP! although it is clear you understood generally all cases ...well... since you are so clever and refuse to declare that you understood it that way I say I do not mean the low and poor 50s kairos/trophies that come from pink cases since you have some EXP you should know that I mean the big multiplier which come from exploring

............

" also for returning to search you dont need to use home button " what a great addition to our subject ! do you think I don't know that?!
" I can clearly see he is not wasting regen focus when he is online " you could be right with this If his multiplier goes below 1 for the time he is not there( 6 and sometime 12 hours) sleeping or watching TV or eating or shitting then when he comes back he gets his full multiplier again .LOL
...........

I will say it one last time : "EAss was robot like in 4th gambit opening cases in less than 2 secs almost all pink cases opend by him and not even logged for 12 hours sometimes ( that alone is enough proof )" and I add not only me who agree and guarantee that .

.I got really bored of your blind defense about EAss . not replying to you any more . you can talk to the hand

Whatever you say, you will learn how it really works by time, or dont, thats your loss.
But dont bring your witch hunting here.

All heil the Macro Führer.

It's true. All of it is true. As further evidence of his crimes, he once turned me into a newt.
...
...
Well, I got better.

Hunting chearter in free games like this takes time and time is Money.
Banning player mean less player = less income in short term.
Using marcos are not allowed but I dont think any player have been banned in this game for doing this so far.
Result: More and more active players use macros ofcause.
If they started to ban all macro users now most top players would be banned so hard to start banning players now.

Originally Posted by Opalia24

Hunting chearter in free games like this takes time and time is Money.
Banning player mean less player = less income in short term.
Using marcos are not allowed but I dont think any player have been banned in this game for doing this so far.
Result: More and more active players use macros ofcause.
If they started to ban all macro users now most top players would be banned so hard to start banning players now.

People act like macros are a given. Does anyone have any proof of it?

I also suspect that the game is probably just being slow on showing that other people have produced pink chests. We're basing our assumptions on the fact that the chest is only available for a few seconds. I'm pretty sure that some were opened before I ever got them to pop up on my screen.

It could be a glitch in the code of the game.

Or we should round up some ducks to give those that we are accusing of witchcraft a fair trial. After all, if Evil Angel is a witch, he will burn. Why will he burn? He's made of wood. If he's made of wood, he'll float. What also floats? A duck.

So if he weighs the same as a duck, he's clearly a witch and should therefore be burned.

Originally Posted by JSensei

People act like macros are a given. Does anyone have any proof of it?

I also suspect that the game is probably just being slow on showing that other people have produced pink chests. We're basing our assumptions on the fact that the chest is only available for a few seconds. I'm pretty sure that some were opened before I ever got them to pop up on my screen.

It could be a glitch in the code of the game.

Or we should round up some ducks to give those that we are accusing of witchcraft a fair trial. After all, if Evil Angel is a witch, he will burn. Why will he burn? He's made of wood. If he's made of wood, he'll float. What also floats? A duck.

So if he weighs the same as a duck, he's clearly a witch and should therefore be burned.

since I played the game for the Collaboration Campaign I liked it so I kept playing and since then .

and brother you are gravely mistaken about that We're basing our assumptions on the fact that the chest is only available for a few seconds .

If you can read threads good you would understand other reasons .

I have read other threads, and I have seen a lot of people make wild claims that can't really be backed up. The biggest evidence is the fact that it shows his last log in as 12 hours ago.

For one, that's not exactly accurate. For two, that shows the last time he went to his home page.

Feel free to believe that he's cheating, but I'd say he's just playing the game better than anyone else. Or perhaps he's a witch. Or any number of things.

If you feel so maligned by him, unfriend him. I rather enjoy the fact that my pink chests are opened quickly. I can count on someone (usually not EA, but someone) opening them instantly. You know what's also super nice? I hit 300 SEGs last event. With ease.

But every time there's a gambit, people get their panties in a bunch. Over what? It's pero, n-gacha tickets, and a bunch of other shit. The pink boxes don't really even have anything worthwhile in them.

Jesus H Christ. People act like EA is taking their children and eating them in front of you. He's playing the game better than anyone. But just to be safe, I'll ask him.

EA, is there any truth to the claims that you eat babies, fly, turn people into newts, or cheat? What say you to these claims? Are you perhaps the Zodiac Killer? You've never denied being the Zodiac Killer.

So speak up.

What should i say/write? Doesn't matter what i write,different ppl always think and believe what they want.

Anyways i never cared what ppl think and write, i just read those threads because they became entertaining at some point.