I never played colo i would have like to play it but well i like shards so i cant complain plus is the fairest event of three i have played until now.
I never played colo i would have like to play it but well i like shards so i cant complain plus is the fairest event of three i have played until now.
IMHO I don't mind these shorter PeroColo type events since they've been between the relaxed Gambit and high rewards EG, although an occasional classic PeroColo would still nice be since these shard events really just drain my SR Wilds, a few puddings, and don't return any. I still have 800 PeroColo tickets, dammit!
Nutaku ID: 465901
Ranking dont matter for me as long as I get in top 1000 but shards and wining strike does matter.
So I just do the easist fight all the time. 100% win chance and same shards as the hard battles.
We players get so few copies of the new items that they dont really matters
I got the 2 R-Stayers and the N-slayer so I hope to get all cards.
Bonus should also be added to number of shards players get - that would improve this event a lot.
Atm it is very hard if you only got 1 or 2 slayers.
the last statement is obv true, having an n slayer which entitles u to 2 shards only per win
i have the old beta r so that would mean 3 shards per win
come next event, i think i have to target just one of the shard girls, im going to have headache rummaging for hours doing this kind of event
unless THEY TRY TO LOWER THE SHARD REQUIREMENT WHICH IS PROB IMPOSSIBLE
I want the old Coloseum, I still have 1280 PeroColo tickets
will disappear when next colo begins. Give them to Kurito instead.
Give one F2P game to a Korean: He will turn it in a P2W (pay to win)
Give one F2P to an American: He will turn it in a P2F (Pay to fail)
Nutaku ID: 454836
I'm sorry, Gambit? Relaxed?
Isn't gambit like the one time everyone starts going bat-sh** insane over attache-steals, macros, the overall struggle to get to round 200...maybe I'm taking it too seriously but the negative aftermath of the last gambit made its way here and someone quite literally Trumped it up.
That bit aside, I've had no complains with shards, other than the fact that it is pretty time-demanding and given its short nature, I can understand how people aren't particularly happy about it compared to other events.
As for the slayer bit, I've noticed that with almost every event there's an obtainable Event Gacha ticket and somewhere with it a card reveal. So long as you don't burn that during the event you got it, you can hold onto that ticket and carry onto the next event, where if you haven't reset your event gacha's SR spectrum, you're guaranteed to get the SR slayer (or could instead grab the R, nab a bundle of event gacha tickets and try again for the SR) Keeping up that cycle usually keeps you on the average line in the events.
Gambit is more relaxed due to how attache cases are not fully necessary. There will always be silver cases up when you get a key, same with gold keys. Furthermore you are not reliant on your focus timer, at least not a lot. So you'll mostly just be able to relax and wait for your stamina to recover, which can take hours.
The craziness and namecalling over attache cases is just a random side-effect.
And we will not see Macro Führers at next gambit, but Macro Lovers.
Give one F2P game to a Korean: He will turn it in a P2W (pay to win)
Give one F2P to an American: He will turn it in a P2F (Pay to fail)
Nutaku ID: 454836
Since defensive wins don't count for anything, why are some people setting up decks designed to cause losses? Like putting 2 Moe cards in a Babe deck, and hoping you get a Moe helper to sometimes beat a Sexy attacker. I suppose if you cause the occasional loss you might move up some fraction of a place in the standings, but really it's just much more of a dick move to mess with people's win streaks like that.