Originally Posted by ChibiKika

That honestly seems loosely interpreted, since in this particular case it's not the impersonation or misrepresentation of an individual, but simply the shared use of multiple individuals, in which all involved parties have consented. While it could very well be considered a ToS violation, I doubt it was the trigger, even if it could be spun both ways.

The problem starts when someone did it wrong with payments doesn't made by original owner (hijacking suspects or even worse, carding, from a business side). Probiller report Nutaku, Nutaku ban the suspicious account.

That's why i quoted that term, but isn't the only which now could ban accounts with this kind of management.

- - - Updated - - -

The fact is Nutaku changed the way how they manage their accounts and ToS has since last gambit a lot of changes. Things tolerated in the past are now suspicious.

P.S: Other change is about hiding IP, a VPN ban? I should ask Nutaku about this, because VPN is a bad cure for many diseases from peruvian ISP (i.e traffic shaping against Flash content)