200 Battlestreak complete hallefuckinglujah lol

Originally Posted by Kotono

The top winning players all have massive amounts of defensive wins. I can't help but wonder if they are just attacking themselves with a bunch of alts...

yep thats what they are doing and it should be bannable offence tbh

Originally Posted by Seya

yep thats what they are doing and it should be bannable offence tbh

+1 although sure they would find some lame loophole....

Players should not be able to see name of who they attack - It can be abbused to:
1) Make tons of weak attack against you main account with alt accounts
2) Give a 2nd accound 5 N girls setup so you win 100% of the times when attacking you alt.
3) Ask a friend if he could setup one of his alt. with 5 N-girls so you not need to attacking you own account but still get 100% wins and 5 tickets each time.

I am not doning any of thise but I am cetain some players do this.

I also think that each player should only be able to attack each othe player once per day.

Always nice to wake up and see that 20ish players have lost against you.

The defense count on the top players seems high indeed.

That said, Opalia24, while i'm not using alt accounts or similar, i do constantly attack the same players over and over. It is the least risky way to get a continuing winning streak without lowering myself to rank 5 players.

after got all cards, i really dont know what to do, its getting boring...

Originally Posted by Opalia24

Players should not be able to see name of who they attack - It can be abbused to:
1) Make tons of weak attack against you main account with alt accounts
2) Give a 2nd accound 5 N girls setup so you win 100% of the times when attacking you alt.
3) Ask a friend if he could setup one of his alt. with 5 N-girls so you not need to attacking you own account but still get 100% wins and 5 tickets each time.

I am not doning any of thise but I am cetain some players do this.

I also think that each player should only be able to attack each othe player once per day.

Okay, I guess asking for that would be a little too detrimental to how rankings are really earned. I would want to at least have a W/L defense ratio, but you're only allowed to see your own? Only 20 people have attacked me and lost. But is that only 20 people or have 50 attacked me and won? At least then I could know to fix my deck to avoid feeding losses to others. Plus I could figure out what rank I am in because I am damn sure I'm not in rank 1 by the way my deck looks, my SED and what rank I'm attacking. lol

Yeah I do the same thing that Tenhou does. I just find rank 5s that are sexy majority and farm them. Just until I get the eGacha. I'm on win 89 though so it might take a while. After that I plan to hit rank 1s for the SR because the only bad side to farming rank 5s is it takes so long to get the cards you want in the gacha.

I agree also with Tenhou on a less risky way to get a win streak started. It may seem unfair and a little evil to do that to rank 5s, especially the way I see the Pero Pero staff wanted to go with this (Each rank faces 1 minus their own rank and vice versa) because having a rank 1 face a rank 5 is completely unfair, but if you plan to stop once you get the egacha, I guess this is a way to prep you for your own rank. You have to build yourself up against people who use gold and have the egacha already so why not take the safe route to get it? I'm not saying it's the best thing and maybe there are easier, nicer ways of doing this but at least take advantage of it. If it's to win and help you and your friends in the future isn't that more important then destroying rank 5s? lol

Also to add on to the discussion about the boxes, I had to knock out all of its contents to get the Silver box done while in the pink box I needed to claim half of the contents to get it. Let's see what gold box has in store for me because I'm not too excited to get 249 items before I get the SR..

Totally agree with the W/L defense ratio. That would help a lot when deciding changes to our decks. We need some kind of parameter to evaluate if our defense decks are working or not.
I have very few defensive victories too, but I can't really tell if I'm just not being targeted or what.

I haven't tried the boxes yet so I can't join that discussion for now xD

Seeing as losing doesn't count for anything in this event (at least not yet... wait until PeroPrincess starts), you're not really doing anything to those poor rank fivers.
Specially with no W/L ratio being displayed to show them how bad they're being hit.

Once PeroPrincess starts things will be different on this, mainly because losing a battle will substract points. Then you'd be decimating the poor guys.

Yeah, I could see how it'd be bad for rank fivers to have a W/L display how bad they are doing. I guess you could argue whether it being implemented would benefit all of us since it has a pro and con. Us rank 1s-3s being the pro (Being able to enhance our deck if we see multiple losses which = not working, therefore giving us more Coliseum tickets) and rank 4 and 5s having the con (They can see about 100 losses so they switch up decks to stop it or try harder to demolish our streak) but you have to wonder what these guys can do, because as stated before on this thread about the stats each card type has and how strong each is to the other, all they could do is switch around the deck or put all of their SRs in, and even then our SRs would be stronger. So I guess the only thing bad about this is crushing their hearts by showing them how bad they're doing? lol. I mean yeah losing doesn't count, but wouldn't seeing a W/L ratio of 0.01 just make you want to give up on this event and PvP style events in general? Just depends on the person, since I had an experience like this on a game called Valkyrie Crusade and all I could do is sit there and let it happen since lvl 100s vs lvl 10s is ludicrous to revenge.

Which brings up another point about battle history: If anything there should definitely not be a history, unless the staff talked about this farming being a possibility. Which brings up the whole "only attacking a certain person once a day" point that Opalia brought up. Valid points. We're trying to make sure these events are fun and well done, so feel free to chime in anyone who disagrees or agrees with this, because I was thinking about this for a few hours now and thought "Well other games have this type of style, why not us"?

Overall I guess it wouldn't work to put it in since it would enhance us at the top of the food chain so to speak and would make the lower tiers look even more weak and defeated. It would definitely help the discussion hearing an opinion from a lower tier player so we can figure out whether this COULD be a nice idea or not. All I want it for is to see if I'm a target which looks like I'm not compared to most since I've only been attacked 20 times(?) and won. lol