Originally Posted by Opalia24

Most players play Moe and they attack Sexy decks all the time.

Example: (I dont really know how many who play which tyoe)
Moe 7000 players
Sexy 700 players
Babe 700 players
No-type 700 players
Total 9100 players.

If all players are active and attack 3 times per hour, we would get:
Attacks on Sexy per hour: 7000*3/700= 30 attacks per hour. (Moe attacks Sexy)
Attacks on Babe per hour: 700*3/700= 3 attacks per hour. (Sexy attacks Babe)
Attacks on Moe per hour: 700*3/7000= 0.3 attacks per hour. (Babe attaks Moe)

This is just a theory but it fit with what I can observe.

Maybe a top player with a Sexy deck that win 100% can get like 500 wins per day + 200 from players who attack to see his deck.
Still I agree it is hard to beleave.

The problem is that you believe that the 2k+ 5rankers with Moe decks are wasting all their attacks on 1rankers with Sexy decks just because they have some mental disability that won't allow them to realize they've spend the last 48hs without sleep attacking the same 10 people that they can never defeat

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not saying all their wins are lamed ones. I do agree that something between 10% and 30% of their wins could be from legitimate wins.
But I just can believe that, if we were to split all the players in almost equal sizes (I'll make each rank smaller than the previous one, and agree that there will be more Moe decks in the first two ranks):
Rank5: 3300 - Moe 1200, Babe 800, Sexy 700, None 600
Rank4: 2200 - Moe 800, Babe 600, Sexy 400, None 400
Rank3: 1700 - Moe 400, Babe 500, Sexy 500, None 300
Rank2: 1300 - Moe 300, Babe 400, Sexy 400, None 200
Rank1: 800 - Moe 150, Babe 200, Sexy 300, None 150

If we had numbers like that, you're telling me that the first day, around 1/5th of all Moe attacks from ranks 4 and 5 were directed against the same 10 people? Again, and again?
Or, if we want to pass the blame regardless of the attribs and ranks, that every single player in this event attacked one of the top 10 players at least once?