Well, it both nice to know I'm not going crazy with the GHQ non-guaranty, and that we'll do deep research on this.

It's not that I believe the BA to be better than GHQ: I actually agree with the rest of you on just how bad it is.
It's the fact that it might be useful some time, and just dismissing it as worse than anything else would just cripple our effectiveness later.

I'm just OCD like that. Can't leave any tone unturned...

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by Xanthius

Can verify that its not a triple guarantee. I most commonly hit 2 misses a day when I spend all my stam on it. 1 miss over a day's time at a slightly lower rate, and some rare days where I've hit 3 misses. Since we've got this investigation in gear now I'll start jotting down my data to contribute to the pool.

I can confirm that I have had days where I only got around 30% triple-spin in GHQ out of a full day of spins.
I have atrocious luck with spins and the like, so I'm pretty much a good resource for foiling optimistic results in these tests

- - - Updated - - -

Ok, I'll start gathering data on this tonight, after the daily reset.

I'll alternate every day between BA and GHQ, until a decisive pattern emerges (or the Colliseum starts), while having a couple of alts try different stages (1-3 included).