they added to Cyrtanthus's skill now she has absorb

Oh god, spent weeks saving to get back up to 50 gems for a gacha pull and i get 4 4 stars and the rest 3 stars, very sad day, i mean even a duplicate 5 star would be less depressing.

Ages ago someone mentioned there is a page somewhere that lists all the knights according to their skill rather than the usual crap found on the wiki ?
Any1 got that link by chance ?

Originally Posted by Myrdin

Ages ago someone mentioned there is a page somewhere that lists all the knights according to their skill rather than the usual crap found on the wiki ?
Any1 got that link by chance ?

Not the Skills or Abilities links at the top of the page?

Originally Posted by Drip

Not the Skills or Abilities links at the top of the page?

Well there is some info there but it seems incomplete.
When I searched for "Evade" It found only 2 girls, which I know is not correct.

Is this normal or did I win some strange jackpot I didn't even know about? And I'm not talking about the FGs.

Originally Posted by DrunkenCount

Is this normal or did I win some strange jackpot I didn't even know about? And I'm not talking about the FGs.

It's your 350 day login reward. But hold your breath, Rainbow Alstroe isn't really a good rainbow. Several golds are better than her. And there's no way to improve her skills or jewelry slots other than wasting blooms on her. :-/

Originally Posted by Myrdin

Well there is some info there but it seems incomplete.
When I searched for "Evade" It found only 2 girls, which I know is not correct.

It's inconsistent. Two girls are listed with a chance to evade, a dozen more are listed with a chance of "evading" right below that

There's enough girls both with evade and with debuff passives that they could get their own header by now. I'd update it if I wasn't so terrible at editing wikis.

Originally Posted by Drip

It's inconsistent. Two girls are listed with a chance to evade, a dozen more are listed with a chance of "evading" right below that

There's enough girls both with evade and with debuff passives that they could get their own header by now. I'd update it if I wasn't so terrible at editing wikis.

Wouldnt it make more sense to codify them under more uniformed terms ? Instead of Evade, Evading, etc just use Evade when its Evade in any way shape or form of the word and actual effect, Skill act when its skill act and skill act based on affection. I mean, somtimes Simler and faster is better, especially when navigating and looking for a particullar thing.
I am not disrespecting your efforts by any means. Rather, I d see it more user friendly (faster and easier to navigate through), thus my 2 cents.