Believe me, I'm just as impatient as you imply you are.
But that doe not make your putting personal unproved theories in the wiki a wrong thing to do.

Wikis have blogs and discussion threads for people to post these theories, and then argue about them.
Be warned that the moment you put up a personal theory in the wiki I'll have it taken down (personally if necesary). While your intentions are good, doing this will be worse for players searching for data.
Your assumption that having wrong data is better than not having any data is completely wrong.

Add all the tabulated data to the wiki, as that is proven objective data.
Then add an entrance to your user's blog where you explain your theories, and link to said data.

In the Kurito's Nest page enter some objective and clinical text that explains that there's no proven method to find out the possible rewards, but there's tabulated data that has been built from users' contributions, and then show the tabulated data (The table with the set of "times", "prizes", and "possible costs".
Then explain that the cost value of each item is based on the JP tabulated data, and might not reflect Nutaku's version.

All those are known facts.
Add the part about there being sometimes some drift from the expected times, but there isn't any user consencus on how that works. Then add that until now, all tabulated data has shown that drift to not stray outside the margins you explained in your earlier post.

See? That's just stating pure facts, all objective data, without the need to add any personal theory.
The wiki isn't there to answer all your questions about the universe, but to gather all the player acquired data, and proven facts, for you to read easily, instead of having to reinvent the wheel yourself.