Yeah, I'm just gonna...go make that other thread.

There are...so many things regarding the "lack of understanding" notes that are being put up here that I want to mouth off about but seeing as I don't have my own documented data to try to push towards a point, I can recognize that most of my arguments here are pretty weak.

And yeah, I'll just go out and say it, that after careful thought, I think the reports of the data we've collected may have been missing a bit of detail that I would have otherwise wanted to use towards a few of my observations-turned-theories. They're still accurate, just missing the extra "umph" to allows space for conjectures.

You still want to disagree, fine. I still want to pursue that idea (not on the wiki, of course) until I'm convinced it's untrue. And maybe if I can show the pattern a bit more clearly it'll seem at least more convincing than me loading everything into an idea shotgun and firing it at random for everyone to bash on.